The Electronic Book Company: Free ebooks

The Electronic Book Company: Free ebooks: Great Reads - Free Reads Welcome! You are only a few clicks away from the prospect of some high-quality and entertaining reading. And...

SAVE INDIANS FROM CONGRESS ATTROCITIES : THE CONTROVERSY OF RAJIV GANDHI MURDER , NO OTHER ...

SAVE INDIANS FROM CONGRESS ATTROCITIES : THE CONTROVERSY OF RAJIV GANDHI MURDER , NO OTHER ...: THE CONTROVERSY OF RAJIV GANDHI MURDER, NO OTHER THAN Smt. SONIA GANDHI Ms.Sonia Gandhi has also fully utilized the martyrdom of her h...

Bharatkalyan97: Beauty of the confluences of rivers

Bharatkalyan97: Beauty of the confluences of rivers: 1. Confluence of the Rhone and Arve Rivers in Geneva, Switzerland 2. Confluence of the Ilz, Danube, and Inn Rivers in Passau, Germany ...

DO YOU KNOW THAT THIS LADY IS SUFFERING FROM AIDS?. Who Will Be target Next? General Sri V.k.Singh Or Baba Ram Dev, It may Be Subramanium Swami, Yogesh Saxena General Secretary , Sandhya Jain, Ashok himani savarkar

This Is an Article Circulated To Me by one of the Most prominent Personality During the Period when I was passing through Cooridor of High Court Bar association and some individual of Top Intelligent Security has handed it over for My Protection. I circulate it as I know that every word written in this article has the glimpses of Truth About Indians Political  situtation. No evidences are left in all such political murders, starting fromthe murder of Lal Raj Pat Rao from Lathi Blow upon his Head ,  Swami Sardhya Nand Swami by Rasheed, Murder planted By Jawahar Lal Nehru of Chandra Shekhar Azad in Alfred Garden for giving Information of His where About by Nehru, when he Came to Meet Gandhi in TSHRAT VILLAH of MUBARAK Ali BARRISTER KNOWN AS ANAND BHAWAN,  Political Murder of Firoj Jahangir Khan Gandhi S/O Nawab Khan of Junagarh , the grooser in Ishrat Villah The HANGING of Bhagat Singh Azad Raj Guru on the Well acquittance of Gandhi, The Bisexual agent Of Britishers, The Killing of defence less Citizens in Jalian wala Bagh, The calculated Mass genocides of Hindus in Partitions, The Killing of Our Soldiers in Kashmir, Hyderabad and in Himalaya, The Kargil War Martyrs Or it may the Foist Attack on Predominant like  Sardar Ballabh bhai Patel bomb threat Planted by Gandhi- nehru close affinities nexus, what the people ,now suspects for panned attempt murder threat given to him or it may be murder of Sri Shyama Prasad Mukharjee after his arrest in Kasmir by Sheikh Abdullah, the cousin of Maulana Nehru false identity having suppresion of the name of Great Grand Father of Jawahar Lal Nehru namely Mr. Gyassuddin Gazi having threat to his life from the supporters of Emperor of Dehli namely Bahadur Shah Jafar , to whom gyassuddin gazi had dragged him being the KOTWAL of BRITISHERs , be it Air Marshall Mukerjee in Japan or Lal Bahadur Shastri in Tashkent or Nagarwalla of SBI in Delhi, Deen Dayal Upadhya By Indira Gandhi, to whom Atal Bijari Bajpai proded the cover of Hiding from the citizens following the Ideals of sri Viveka Nand Ji Swarswati, Daya Nand Swarswti , Neta Ji Subhash Chandra Bose, Nana Bhai Dashmukh Veer Savarkar and Syama Prasad Mukharjee. The Lists of Such Assisnations directly convey the hands of Foreign Countr Intelligent Secret Agency, It Maw be KGB, MOSAD, CIA, ISI Governing our Nation through Super imposed identity, be it be identit of Gandhi, Nehru , ZAKIR HUSSAIN his Son involved in hijaking the Air Force plane, in Which Air Marshal Sri Arjun Singh was traveling, FARRUKHDEEN ALI AHAMAD, Having kingpin in Bangla desi Muslims Migrations, this country is subjected to subjugation in the larger Conspiracy. Brewt Yes, belonging to top Secret Agency is the Son In Law of Mr. Man Mohan Singh and Now Our President has become Decorated Dummy Placed at the Highest Place in Our Country By No Other by Eu Pair Lady, entertaining her Customers in the Bar of England, from where she was Planted By palio Mani o- Stefano Nexus to Control Our Great Nation and Pt it to the naught of Abrogations and Subjugation, Be it Fair or the Haul infringement. The Series of political murder Committed one by one from the murder of San jay Gandhi in plane Crash, where in the Key to operate Swiss Bank Accounts were ultimately gone in the Hand of Indira Gandhi, resulting in her elimination by no other , but Sonia Gandhi by keeping Prime minister Body in the Ambesdor Car having no equipment of Medical Emergency in connivance with close nexus of Mr. R.k.Dhavan have been lying under the dark clouds about the integrity of this lady, planted by the KGB first by Russian Intelligent First and now by the CIA of Americans Intelligence, ith whon our Intelligent service namely the RAW has been Merged Completely. The Murder of Rajiv Gandhi By Lite Prabhakaran , In whose Connivance of 34 Antiques were stolen from our Nation by No other , but his Own wife Smt Sonia Gandhi Has well being established by the Close Affinities of Smt Bentica Roborto with the Lady Used for Assissnation of Mr. Rajiv Gandhi. The Political Murder of Rajesh piolet, Madho Raj Sindhiya In suspicious Circumstances has came to the light and the finger of Suspicions point out the Culprit as no other than Smt Sonia Gandhi. the Murder has got the Back ground in case of Madho Rao Sindhiya was illicit relationship of this Lady, which Came to Notice Of Mr. Rajiv Gandhi, when in 1980 at about 1.30 A.M. , Madho Rao Sindhya was Fully intoxicant was colluded inside the Car got the head injury lady associated in sex Namely Sanio Manio of Turin escaped, but the Student of IIT Delhi rescued him and provided the Medical assistance in Deep crisis. this Was the Same Madho Rao sindhiya , The successor of his Ansesters, who are having the blood of Anti Nationalist sPrit and Taking Advantage of their Terrorist activities in denying the hide in Rani Laxmi Bai in Gwalier, Indira Gandhi Got the Entire Jewelery being Stollen under the HIDES of INCOME TAX Department. Enforcement Wing. The list is quit eloberate and YSR Murder is also one emerged inside there. The Principle is that if you are Dishonest person, we can wipe out your Existence For Ever as the Principles of Islam and Critianity applied for their use UPON HINDUS, that once you are inside the inner circle of nexus of BRIBE, DECEIVE, DECEPTIVENESS in their identity for Sake of Money, The Betrayal from the Members of MANIO - STEFENO FAIMLY membership nexus is without default is punishable to death Penality. Why Afzal And Kasab are Safe in India? the Reason Behind this May be that The Parliamentarian Attacks and Attacks In Mumbai might have been planted By thois Faimly. Why the relatives of Roberts Vadehra Family were Eliminated one After Another, the reason is pure and simple that they refused to commit murder, robery and having deception with the Well Being Of this Nation. I Have the evidences that who as the Lady actally Planted the Murder of General Vaidhya?. The Creation of Bhiderwala and elimination of Sikhs Community was the Planning by No Other but this Lady ? DO YOU KNOW THAT THIS LADY IS SUFFERING FROM AIDS?. Who Will Be target Next? General Sri V.k.Singh Or Baba Ram Dev, It may Be Subramanium Swami, Yogesh Saxena General Secretary , Sandhya Jain, Ashok himani savarkar or it May Be Acharya Naresh of Udbheet Sthali at Raj Garh  Near Simla
Why The People Out Side INDIA IN EUROPE and In UK Call US HOOKOO MONKEY And the WHY Diplomat Of  Singapore Called Us that INDIANS? INDIANS ARE IDIOTS, HALF HIDDEN AND HALF PROJECTED. We and SOMALIA, TANZANIA, NIGERIA, PERU, BRAZIL are Having the similar Genetic Background of Our Ancesters and THUS INDIANS ARE NO OTHER BUT PURCHASABLE COMMUNITY.

CNERGE SHEET BY CBI DISCLOSING CLOSE NEXUS BETWEEN PRABHAKARAN LIET FIRM USED FOR SMUGGLING OF 34 ANTIQUES BY MANIO FAIMLY AND KILLER OF RAJIV GANDHI

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

                                                     SPE/SIU (XII)

                                                     NEW DELHI

                                         _________________________________

1.      PROGRESS REPORT NO.            :           1

AND DATE.                     :           23.02.1993

                                       

2.      CASE NO. AND DATE      :          RC.1/93-SIU(XII)

OF REGISTRATION          :         Dt.08.07.1993

3.      NAME OF THE ACCUSED  :       M/s . Southern Arts,

                                         Exporters of Indian Handicrafts

                                                     10-D, First East Main Road,

                                         Shenoy Nagar,

                                         Madras and Unknown Others.

4.      OFFENCES                      :            U/s 120-B IPC and  Sec.25 (1)

                                         r/w Sec.3(1) of Antiquities and

                                         Art Treasures Act, 1972

5.      NAME OF THE IO.          :                                   Shri Hari Kumar, Inspr/SIU.

6.      NO. OF WITNESSES       :

EXAMINED

That, M/s. Southern Arts, Exporters of Indian Handicrafts, 10-D, First Main Road, Shenoy Nagar, Madras, exported 34 items from the port of Madras to Mr. Guide Zanderige Via 24 Maggie 437126 Verona, Italy, in connivance with the officials of Customs of Madras, Illegally against the provisions of the Antiquities & Art Treasures Act, 1972. On inspection of the aforesaid 34 items by Dr. C. Margbandhu, Director (Exploration), ASI, New Delhi at Pisa, Italy at the instance of Department of Culture, Ministry of Human Resources Development, New Delhi, 19 items were found to be “Antiquity”. In view of above, the instant case was registered against the Exporter (and unknown others).

                 

9.                  DEVELOPMENTS:-

During the fortnight under review, the IO Submitt plan of Action in the case. A copy of the same is enclosed herewith. Special Look-out notices have also been sent to NCRB/New Delhi and to the Director General of Police of Southern States along with the photocopies of photographs of the items, which are lying presently at Pisa, Italy with the Customs Authorities, requesting them to check their records under their jurisdiction with a view to find out, if any report regarding the theft of any the item, is reputed, to them. Interpol/CBI/New Delhi has been requested to move to IP/Rome for the seizure of the consignment, in question, lying with Customs authorities in Pisa, Italy and restitution of the same to India thereafter. The matter has also been reported to Secretary, Department of Culture, Ministry of Human Resources & Development, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi so that they may inform to the Embassy of India at Rome, Italy, for necessary direction to Customs Authorities in Pisa, Italy, for not releasing the consignment to the Importer. The IO has proceeded to Madras in connection with the investigation of this case and the progress shall be reported to HO on his return.

10.               CD (S) NO. & DATE (S)      : C.D. No.1 dated   .07.1993

                    ON WHICH PR BASED      : C.D. No.1 dated   .07.1993  

                                                                               C.D. No.1 dated   .07.1993

                                                                               C.D. No.1 dated   .07.1993

11.               PENDING ACTION              : A detailed Plan of Action

                                                                               Submitted by the IO, is

                                                                               Enclosed herewith.

DETAILED PLAN OF ACTION SUBMITTED IN CASE RC.1/93-SIU(XII) FOR PERUSAL.

                                                     _______

1.                  To take immediate steps for retrieval of the case property from Italy by moving the Interpol as well as Indian Embassy in Rome.

2.                  To send reference to Interpol for conducting part investigation in Italy regarding the examination of the Importer.

3.                  To visit Madra:-

i.                     information to be collected from the exporters regarding the procurement of the antiquities, their supplier etc. and also to elicit information regarding the conspiracy if any with ASI or customs. Collect the original shipping bills and other documents from the Customs Madras and also examine the concerned appraiser who passed the consignment.

ii.                   To examine the ASI officials in Madras to know whether the consignment was referred to them by customs authorities and also to know whether the exporters ever obtained the non-antiquity certificate for the items they exported, and also examined the concerned officers.

iii.                 To examin concerned CHA in Madras who facilitated the shipment of the consignment. Further to seize the copy of the concerned shipping bill available with the CHA and also to examine the concerned persons, procuring their, specimen handwriting and signature etc. to prove that the shipping bill was prepared by them (For GEQD Reference).

iv.                 To interrogate the partners or the proprietors of the exporter i.e. M/s. Southern Arts,                   Exporters of Indian Handicrafts, 10-D Ist East Main Road, Shenoy Nagar, Madras to know the facts and circumstances by which they could manage to export the consignment consisting the antiquities by hoodwinking the authorities and smuggling the items. Further

v.                   To collect information regarding the payments made by the Italian customer for particular consignment and also to visit the concerned bank and obtain the records pertaining to payment.

vi.                 To collect all other information which may crop up during the investigation like the export licence or permit etc. of the exporter.

4.                  To make efforts to know whether the antiquities in this case are of stolen items by sending Special Look Out Notices and also to other sources like publishing the photograph of the seize antiquities in major national newspapers.

5.                  Any other points as suggested by SP.

Submitted for perusal.                                                  1.         Ms.Sonia Gandhi may well turn out to be India’s Fujimori, the Peruvian Leader of Japanese descent. It is now known that Fujimori has been secretly maintaining and hiding his Japanese citizenship while claiming to be a natural born Peruvian national. The wrath of the people of Peru came to visit upon Fujimori when his corrupt activities came to be unraveled, so he bolted back to Japan with his loot intact and then revealed that he had been all  along a born Japanese citizen, and thus immune from extradition to Peru. Ms. Sonia Gandhi has like Fujimori in Peru a long history of committing fraud on the public. Ms. Sonia Gandhi shares Fujimori’s mendacity as well. For, example, in the Lok Sabha Who’s Who, on page 290-91, Ms.Gandhi has claimed to have been educated in the Cambridge University. This is utterly and completely false. Ms. Gandhi had instead gone to the town of Cambridge to learn English in a unrecognized teaching shop. Such falsehood is thus reflective of the duplicitous mentality of Ms. Sonia Gandhi. Time is now near for her to be exposed as India’s Fujimori.

2.         Ms. Sonia Gandhi’s track record, hitherto unscrutinized, reveals an incredible venality and culpability under criminal laws of the country. She is therefore extremely vunerable to any hostile government, and thus would seriously jeopardize the prospects of an opposition coalition that included the Congress Party in an election campaign against the incumbent in office. The track record of Ms.Sonia Gandhi as a habitual law breaker are illustrated below.

A.               In 1972, Ms.Sonia Gandhi took employment as an insurance agent of Oriental Fire Insurance, a public sector firm. As a foreigner as she was then, she committed a criminal offence by taking such employment. Furthermore, she showed her business address as the official residence of the then Prime Minister and her mother-in-law, Mrs. Indira Gandhi, at 1, Safdarjung Road, New Delhi, which is an offence. Besides these, she collected commissions on insurance policy sold to Maruti and to individuals in the Prime Minister’s Office, which is also an offence. These facts came to light in a Rajya Sabha Question Hour in November                1974. The then Prime Minister Mrs.Indira Gandhi,and mother-in-law later announced in the House that Mrs.Sonia Gandhi had resigned her insurance agency, a clear admission of culpability under law. The three offences listed above are not subject to the statute of limitation, and thus the failure to prosecute Ms.Sonia Gandhi then, is no bar to launching prosecution now.

B.         On January 25, 1973, Ms.Sonia Gandhi was appointed the Managing Director of Maruti Technical Services Private Ltd.[MTSPL] in an “extraordinary” meeting of two share holders who together held all the shares, 20 shares each of Rs.10 per share. The two shareholders at the meeting were Ms.Sonia Gandhi and Mr.Sanjay Gandhi. The MTSPL was incorporated on November 16, 1970. On September 28, 1974, Ms.Sonia Gandhi was made the MD of the Maruti Heavy Vehicles Private Ltd.[MHVPL], which was incorporated on February 22, 1974 with 13 shareholders in which the Gandhis had controlling interest. The Maruti car company and the heavy vehicles firm entered into a consultancy contact for expert advice with MTSPL for which susstantial fees were paid.

In 1978, the Commission of Inquiry headed by Supreme Court Judge Mr.A.C.Gupta, appointed by the Janata Party government, submitted its Report on the affairs of the Maruti companies. The Commission recorded the depositions of S.Kumar, Registrar of companies, and A.Banerjee, Income tax officer, Mr.Kumar held that “the allotment of shares of the MTSPL and MHVPL to Ms.Sonia Gandhi  was in contravention of Section 28(1) of FERA 1973 which prohibited foreigners from owning shares in Indian companies, and hence was ab initio void in law. By Section 56, Ms.Sonia Gandhi thus committed a criminal offence that limitation on this offence even if FERA stands replaced by FEMA in 2000. Thus Ms.Sonia Gandhi can be prosecuted even today. Furthermore, the Gupta Commission recorded that Income Tax Officer, A. Banerjee had disallowed the remuneration paid by MTSPL to Ms.Sonia Gandhi “because she had no qualifications to be able to render any technical service to the company.” Considering that Ms. Sonia Gandhi holds an unrecognized “diploma” from a English Language teaching shop for unemployed European girls in the city of Cambridge, England, that is quite obvious. Hence a fraud was committed, for which Ms. Gandhi can be prosecuted under Income Tax law as well.

C.         The electoral rolls of the New Delhi Constituency were revised in 1980 with January of that year as the qualifying date. When the voter list was published, Ms. Sonia Gandhi, then an Italian citizen, illegally became a voter at serial number 388 of polling station number 145 of that constituency. Ms. Gandhi applied to become an Indian citizen only on April 7, 1983, and was granted citizenship with lightening speed on the same day. But during the three years till the beginning of 1983, Ms. Sonia Gandhi remained on the voter roll committing offences punishable under Section 31 of the Representation of Peoples Act 1950, of a maximum sentence of one year and fine. Ms. Sonia Gandhi cannot say that she was not willfully committing this grievous offence because to become a voter, one has to fill and sign Form 6 prepared under the Electors Rules 1960 in which affirmation of citizenship of India is essential. Hence Ms. Gandhi by this false affirmation also committed offences under the Indian Penal Code, particularly Sections 192 and 199, which carry a three year punishment.

D.         During the 1980s, Ms.Sonia Gandhi’s mother Mrs.Paola Maino, and sister Anushka Vinci had developed business connections with Snam Progetti’s resident in India, Mr.Ottavio Quattrocchi. The Influence wielded by Rajiv Gandhi’s Italian in-laws enabled Quattrocchi to corner government contracts such Thal Vaishet fertilizer project, as well as to broker deals such as the Bofors 155mm gun sale to the Indian Army. Affidavits filed in a Malaysian court and documents with the CBI establish that Sonia’s sister Anushka and her husband (now ex) Walter Vinci were beneficiaries from the receipts of Quattrocchi from Bofors company. Quattrocchi has also declared that he is a close friend of Ms.Sonia Gandhi, a claim not denied by her. Hence Ms.Sonia Gandhi, her sister and mother are candidates for inclusion in the Bofors bribery case FIR under Section   319 of the Cr.P.C., to be thus investigated and prosecuted.

E.                  Revelations contained in the archives of the KGB became public, and some of which were published in Pravda and Izvestia in 1992 following the liquidation of the Soviet Union. Most of these Archives are now kept in a library at Harvard University, USA. One letter in the archives documents the regular payment of commission to Ms.Sonia Gandhi and the Maino family in Italy, arranged by the KGB. One letter [published in a Russian news daily Izvestia on June 27, 1992 in an article by Ms.Yevgenia Albats of Moscow News] was written by the then KGB chief, Viktor Chebrikov to the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union [CPSU]. The KGB chief reporting these payments to the CPSU for ractification, stated that members of the Rajiv Gandhi family had expressed profound gratitude for the help being received by them through commercial deals of an organizations. In a confidential message to the KGB, stated Chebrikov to the CPSU, “they [the Mainos] informed that a major part of these resources was used to support the party of Mr.Rajiv Gandhi”. Only July 3, 1992 Ms.Tatiana Samolis, the spokesperson of the KGB’s successor organization, the Federal Intelligence service [FIS], in a press briefing in Moscow [which was reported in the Hindu 4.7.92] confirmed that indeed such a connection between the KGB and Mainos had existed “in view of the ideological confrontation that prevailed in the world at that time” In the 1989 elections for example the Mainos spent Rs.10 crores on select candidates of the Congress Party in the General Elections, obviously to create cheerleaders for Ms.Sonia Gandhi for a future contingency, Mr.Arjun Singh was one such recipient from the Mainos. Ms.Sonia Gandhi, her mother and sister are thus guilty of offences under IPC Sections 120B read with 171-C and 171-H, as well as FERA and FCRA.

F.                  The Mainos have systematically plundered and exported the ancient treasures of India, especially temple sculptures of Tamil Nadu, Andhra, Orissa and Madhya Pradesh, Mughal paintings and precious gems in Indian Museums, all protected and banned from export under the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. The CBI had in 1993 registered cases on such illegal exports from a Chennai Suburb to an identified person in Italy (see enclosed document). Alitalia and Air India flights were used to send unchecked crates after after crates misusing the SPG cover first to Italy for display in shops owned by her family e.g.Etnica in Rivolta or Ganpati in Orbassano [see enclosed photo and calling card], and after creating an ownership on paper, getting the contraband auctioned by Sotheebys and Christies, the London auctioneers. Fred Watson’s            Sothebys-An Inside Story [Random House, 1998] gives some clues on such a racket. There is in the records of the Ministry of Human Resources enough materials in Notes on file of Directors Generals of Archeological Survey of India to suggest precious ancient paintings of the Mughal period were removed and declared “stolen” or missing, but ended up in a house in Golf Links, New Delhi which Ms.Sonia Gandhi had frequented. Even the Festival of India was used as a ploy to smuggle out such treasures.  In arranging these delicate operations the Mainos took the help Mr.Arjun Singh [when he was Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister and later Union Human Resources Development Minister], art expert Martand Singh, a Pakistani couple Muneer and Farida Attaullah, London based Pakistani fixer Salman Thassir a prince of Kuwait, and even the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) which has been convicted by courts in India for the assassination of Mr.Rajiv Gandhi Thus, Ms.Sonia Gandhi and her Italian relatives are culpable for various offences under the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act as well as under Sections 295, 378 and 410 of the IPC.

G.                  When Rajiv Gandhi married Sonia Gandhi on February 25, 1968, she was poor. Her Father Stefano Maino had lost everything after his party leader, Benito Mussolini, the II Duce of Fascist Italy, was overthrown and killed. After World War II, Stefano became a brick layer, and Sonia’s mother, Paola Predebon, a share cropper. Like many poor Italian families, Sonia was dispatched to learn English in a teaching shop in Cambridge town and thus land a job as an hostess or in similar employment, a modest goal indeed. Her marriage to Rajiv Gandhi on 25.2.68 however changed all that. And because of the aforesaid illegal activities, the Maino family became in just 25 years the richest family of Italy with net worth of US $ 2.0 billion. The respected Swiss magazine, Schweizer Illusttrierte, in its November 1991 issue, reported that the Mainos had in 1991 about $2.7 billion. But over the 1990s decade, the Mainos appear to have lost some of the money due to reckless investments, collapse of the Barings Bank, and ostentatious spending. They are still worth about US $2.0 billion today.

H.                 Ms.Sonia Gandhi has also fully utilized the martyrdom of her husband Rajiv Gandhi to advance her political career as well as to take control of the Nehru family’s monetary inheritance. The Rajiv Gandhi Foundation was set up under her chairmanship and Rs.200 crores collected during Narasimha Rao’s          tenure as PM, for use in education and public affairs. Yet an analysis of the accounts of the Foundation show that only 3% of the income is being used for the stated objectives while 97% is deployed  for other goals including for private travel of Ms.Gandhi and her chosen ones. This is a violation of the Trust Act and thus Ms.Gandhi and other trustees can be          proceeded under Section 92 of the CPC. There is already a PIL in the Delhi High Court in this matter.

3.                  Circumstantial evidence is also fast accumulating that makes it now imperative for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe whether the mother (Ms.Paola Maino) and sister (Ms.Anushka Vinci) of Ms.Sonia Gandhi, have had a long term continuing association since 1984 with the terrorist organization, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), The Supreme Court had delivered on May 12, 1999 a stinging judgement that held the LTTE responsible for the assassination of India’s former Prime Minister Mr.Rajiv Gandhi. The Government had set up a Multi Disciplinary Monitoring Agency (MDMA) in August 1998, led by the CBI, to probe leads such as that have now surfaced regarding the Maino-LTTE links.

4.                  The Circumstantial evidence of these links include Sonia Gandhi’s plea for commuting the death penalty for her husband’s killers; in providing one acre of land near the Indira Gandhi International Airport, Delhi, for housing the Periyar Centre for the pro-LTTE and secessionist Dravida Kazhagam (DK) which had been indicted in Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination by the Jain Commission (Part III, Vol.IV, Chapter VII, Pages 161-73, of the Final Report) and whose seven key members have been sentenced along with nineteen others of the LTTE by the Supreme Court, for participating in the assassination conspiracy. There are several other examples of Ms.Sonia Gandhi going inexplicably soft                     on the LTTE, including remaining silent on the failure of the government to extradite the LTTE Supremo Prabhakaran.

5.                  The CBI-led Multi Disciplinary Monitoring Agency (MDMA) set up after the Jain Commission Final Report, should therefore send interrogatories to the Maino family in Italy about all this, and investigate the extent of their connections with LTTE.

6.            Ms.Sonia Gandhi’s family in Italy constitutes a major national security risk for India, but paradoxically they enjoy the cover of the Indian state for their nefarious activities. The RAW, India’s foreign intelligence agency has reports of this national security risk. While in service (during Rajiv Gandhi’s tenure as PM), the Additional Director of RAW, B.Raman had in a report stated:

                                                                                                                

“Ms.Sonia Gandhi’s umbilical cord is strongly tied to Italy. Her close relatives are Italian citizens living in Italy. India has important national security interest in Italy because of its arms, nuclear and technology supply relationships with Pakistan and China.”

Raman concluded that no source in Italy or in EU would cooperate with Indian Intelligence on this issue since they would fear that one day perhaps these sources may fall into Italian hands. After retirement from RAW, Raman even published these views in Statesman (May 16, 1999) in an article under his own name.

Italy, incidentally, is flouting US sanctions and providing avionics to the Sino-Pakistan Joint project to manufacture the F-1 Chinese design plane update, which is to be a successor to the US F-16 super fighter jets. Indian Intelligence is busy trying to build sources in Italy to track details of this collaboration.

7.       For all these information I have written to Ms.Vasundara Raje, Minister in charge of Personnel (i.e.,CBI) to initiate a CBI inquiry. On all the above, if on no action is initiated, I will have no other option but to move the courts myself to set the law into motion.                                 

     

                                                                                         We, The People Of India

                                                                               Appeal to the Nationalists Straight forward Citizen

                                                                                 Strive to Protect The Dignity of our Nation

Ms.Sonia Gandhi’s mother Mrs.Paola Maino, and sister Anushka Vinci had developed business connections with Snam Progetti’s resident in India, Mr.Ottavio Quattrocchi.

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

                                                     SPE/SIU (XII)

                                                     NEW DELHI

                                         _________________________________

1.      PROGRESS REPORT NO.            :           1

AND DATE.                    :           23.02.1993

                                       

2.      CASE NO. AND DATE      :          RC.1/93-SIU(XII)

OF REGISTRATION          :         Dt.08.07.1993

3.      NAME OF THE ACCUSED  :       M/s . Southern Arts,

                                         Exporters of Indian Handicrafts

                                                     10-D, First East Main Road,

                                         Shenoy Nagar,

                                         Madras and Unknown Others.

4.      OFFENCES                      :            U/s 120-B IPC and  Sec.25 (1)

                                         r/w Sec.3(1) of Antiquities and

                                         Art Treasures Act, 1972

5.      NAME OF THE IO.          :                                   Shri Hari Kumar, Inspr/SIU.

6.      NO. OF WITNESSES       :

EXAMINED

That, M/s. Southern Arts, Exporters of Indian Handicrafts, 10-D, First Main Road, Shenoy Nagar, Madras, exported 34 items from the port of Madras to Mr. Guide Zanderige Via 24 Maggie 437126 Verona, Italy, in connivance with the officials of Customs of Madras, Illegally against the provisions of the Antiquities & Art Treasures Act, 1972. On inspection of the aforesaid 34 items by Dr. C. Margbandhu, Director (Exploration), ASI, New Delhi at Pisa, Italy at the instance of Department of Culture, Ministry of Human Resources Development, New Delhi, 19 items were found to be “Antiquity”. In view of above, the instant case was registered against the Exporter (and unknown others).

                 

9.                  DEVELOPMENTS:-

During the fortnight under review, the IO Submitt plan of Action in the case. A copy of the same is enclosed herewith. Special Look-out notices have also been sent to NCRB/New Delhi and to the Director General of Police of Southern States along with the photocopies of photographs of the items, which are lying presently at Pisa, Italy with the Customs Authorities, requesting them to check their records under their jurisdiction with a view to find out, if any report regarding the theft of any the item, is reputed, to them. Interpol/CBI/New Delhi has been requested to move to IP/Rome for the seizure of the consignment, in question, lying with Customs authorities in Pisa, Italy and restitution of the same to India thereafter. The matter has also been reported to Secretary, Department of Culture, Ministry of Human Resources & Development, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi so that they may inform to the Embassy of India at Rome, Italy, for necessary direction to Customs Authorities in Pisa, Italy, for not releasing the consignment to the Importer. The IO has proceeded to Madras in connection with the investigation of this case and the progress shall be reported to HO on his return.

10.               CD (S) NO. & DATE (S)      : C.D. No.1 dated   .07.1993

                    ON WHICH PR BASED      : C.D. No.1 dated   .07.1993  

                                                                               C.D. No.1 dated   .07.1993

                                                                               C.D. No.1 dated   .07.1993

11.               PENDING ACTION             : A detailed Plan of Action

                                                                               Submitted by the IO, is

                                                                               Enclosed herewith.

DETAILED PLAN OF ACTION SUBMITTED IN CASE RC.1/93-SIU(XII) FOR PERUSAL.

                                                     _______

1.                  To take immediate steps for retrieval of the case property from Italy by moving the Interpol as well as Indian Embassy in Rome.

2.                  To send reference to Interpol for conducting part investigation in Italy regarding the examination of the Importer.

3.                  To visit Madra:-

i.                     information to be collected from the exporters regarding the procurement of the antiquities, their supplier etc. and also to elicit information regarding the conspiracy if any with ASI or customs. Collect the original shipping bills and other documents from the Customs Madras and also examine the concerned appraiser who passed the consignment.

ii.                   To examine the ASI officials in Madras to know whether the consignment was referred to them by customs authorities and also to know whether the exporters ever obtained the non-antiquity certificate for the items they exported, and also examined the concerned officers.

iii.                 To examin concerned CHA in Madras who facilitated the shipment of the consignment. Further to seize the copy of the concerned shipping bill available with the CHA and also to examine the concerned persons, procuring their, specimen handwriting and signature etc. to prove that the shipping bill was prepared by them (For GEQD Reference).

iv.                 To interrogate the partners or the proprietors of the exporter i.e. M/s. Southern Arts,                   Exporters of Indian Handicrafts, 10-D Ist East Main Road, Shenoy Nagar, Madras to know the facts and circumstances by which they could manage to export the consignment consisting the antiquities by hoodwinking the authorities and smuggling the items. Further

v.                   To collect information regarding the payments made by the Italian customer for particular consignment and also to visit the concerned bank and obtain the records pertaining to payment.

vi.                 To collect all other information which may crop up during the investigation like the export licence or permit etc. of the exporter.

4.                  To make efforts to know whether the antiquities in this case are of stolen items by sending Special Look Out Notices and also to other sources like publishing the photograph of the seize antiquities in major national newspapers.

5.                  Any other points as suggested by SP.

Submitted for perusal.                                                  1.         Ms.Sonia Gandhi may well turn out to be India’s Fujimori, the Peruvian Leader of Japanese descent. It is now known that Fujimori has been secretly maintaining and hiding his Japanese citizenship while claiming to be a natural born Peruvian national. The wrath of the people of Peru came to visit upon Fujimori when his corrupt activities came to be unraveled, so he bolted back to Japan with his loot intact and then revealed that he had been all  along a born Japanese citizen, and thus immune from extradition to Peru. Ms. Sonia Gandhi has like Fujimori in Peru a long history of committing fraud on the public. Ms. Sonia Gandhi shares Fujimori’s mendacity as well. For, example, in the Lok Sabha Who’s Who, on page 290-91, Ms.Gandhi has claimed to have been educated in the Cambridge University. This is utterly and completely false. Ms. Gandhi had instead gone to the town of Cambridge to learn English in a unrecognized teaching shop. Such falsehood is thus reflective of the duplicitous mentality of Ms. Sonia Gandhi. Time is now near for her to be exposed as India’s Fujimori.

2.         Ms. Sonia Gandhi’s track record, hitherto unscrutinized, reveals an incredible venality and culpability under criminal laws of the country. She is therefore extremely vunerable to any hostile government, and thus would seriously jeopardize the prospects of an opposition coalition that included the Congress Party in an election campaign against the incumbent in office. The track record of Ms.Sonia Gandhi as a habitual law breaker are illustrated below.

A.               In 1972, Ms.Sonia Gandhi took employment as an insurance agent of Oriental Fire Insurance, a public sector firm. As a foreigner as she was then, she committed a criminal offence by taking such employment. Furthermore, she showed her business address as the official residence of the then Prime Minister and her mother-in-law, Mrs. Indira Gandhi, at 1, Safdarjung Road, New Delhi, which is an offence. Besides these, she collected commissions on insurance policy sold to Maruti and to individuals in the Prime Minister’s Office, which is also an offence. These facts came to light in a Rajya Sabha Question Hour in November                1974. The then Prime Minister Mrs.Indira Gandhi,and mother-in-law later announced in the House that Mrs.Sonia Gandhi had resigned her insurance agency, a clear admission of culpability under law. The three offences listed above are not subject to the statute of limitation, and thus the failure to prosecute Ms.Sonia Gandhi then, is no bar to launching prosecution now.

B.         On January 25, 1973, Ms.Sonia Gandhi was appointed the Managing Director of Maruti Technical Services Private Ltd.[MTSPL] in an “extraordinary” meeting of two share holders who together held all the shares, 20 shares each of Rs.10 per share. The two shareholders at the meeting were Ms.Sonia Gandhi and Mr.Sanjay Gandhi. The MTSPL was incorporated on November 16, 1970. On September 28, 1974, Ms.Sonia Gandhi was made the MD of the Maruti Heavy Vehicles Private Ltd.[MHVPL], which was incorporated on February 22, 1974 with 13 shareholders in which the Gandhis had controlling interest. The Maruti car company and the heavy vehicles firm entered into a consultancy contact for expert advice with MTSPL for which susstantial fees were paid.

In 1978, the Commission of Inquiry headed by Supreme Court Judge Mr.A.C.Gupta, appointed by the Janata Party government, submitted its Report on the affairs of the Maruti companies. The Commission recorded the depositions of S.Kumar, Registrar of companies, and A.Banerjee, Income tax officer, Mr.Kumar held that “the allotment of shares of the MTSPL and MHVPL to Ms.Sonia Gandhi  was in contravention of Section 28(1) of FERA 1973 which prohibited foreigners from owning shares in Indian companies, and hence was ab initio void in law. By Section 56, Ms.Sonia Gandhi thus committed a criminal offence that limitation on this offence even if FERA stands replaced by FEMA in 2000. Thus Ms.Sonia Gandhi can be prosecuted even today. Furthermore, the Gupta Commission recorded that Income Tax Officer, A. Banerjee had disallowed the remuneration paid by MTSPL to Ms.Sonia Gandhi “because she had no qualifications to be able to render any technical service to the company.” Considering that Ms. Sonia Gandhi holds an unrecognized “diploma” from a English Language teaching shop for unemployed European girls in the city of Cambridge, England, that is quite obvious. Hence a fraud was committed, for which Ms. Gandhi can be prosecuted under Income Tax law as well.

C.         The electoral rolls of the New Delhi Constituency were revised in 1980 with January of that year as the qualifying date. When the voter list was published, Ms. Sonia Gandhi, then an Italian citizen, illegally became a voter at serial number 388 of polling station number 145 of that constituency. Ms. Gandhi applied to become an Indian citizen only on April 7, 1983, and was granted citizenship with lightening speed on the same day. But during the three years till the beginning of 1983, Ms. Sonia Gandhi remained on the voter roll committing offences punishable under Section 31 of the Representation of Peoples Act 1950, of a maximum sentence of one year and fine. Ms. Sonia Gandhi cannot say that she was not willfully committing this grievous offence because to become a voter, one has to fill and sign Form 6 prepared under the Electors Rules 1960 in which affirmation of citizenship of India is essential. Hence Ms. Gandhi by this false affirmation also committed offences under the Indian Penal Code, particularly Sections 192 and 199, which carry a three year punishment.

D.         During the 1980s, Ms.Sonia Gandhi’s mother Mrs.Paola Maino, and sister Anushka Vinci had developed business connections with Snam Progetti’s resident in India, Mr.Ottavio Quattrocchi. The Influence wielded by Rajiv Gandhi’s Italian in-laws enabled Quattrocchi to corner government contracts such Thal Vaishet fertilizer project, as well as to broker deals such as the Bofors 155mm gun sale to the Indian Army. Affidavits filed in a Malaysian court and documents with the CBI establish that Sonia’s sister Anushka and her husband (now ex) Walter Vinci were beneficiaries from the receipts of Quattrocchi from Bofors company. Quattrocchi has also declared that he is a close friend of Ms.Sonia Gandhi, a claim not denied by her. Hence Ms.Sonia Gandhi, her sister and mother are candidates for inclusion in the Bofors bribery case FIR under Section   319 of the Cr.P.C., to be thus investigated and prosecuted.

E.                  Revelations contained in the archives of the KGB became public, and some of which were published in Pravda and Izvestia in 1992 following the liquidation of the Soviet Union. Most of these Archives are now kept in a library at Harvard University, USA. One letter in the archives documents the regular payment of commission to Ms.Sonia Gandhi and the Maino family in Italy, arranged by the KGB. One letter [published in a Russian news daily Izvestia on June 27, 1992 in an article by Ms.Yevgenia Albats of Moscow News] was written by the then KGB chief, Viktor Chebrikov to the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union [CPSU]. The KGB chief reporting these payments to the CPSU for ractification, stated that members of the Rajiv Gandhi family had expressed profound gratitude for the help being received by them through commercial deals of an organizations. In a confidential message to the KGB, stated Chebrikov to the CPSU, “they [the Mainos] informed that a major part of these resources was used to support the party of Mr.Rajiv Gandhi”. Only July 3, 1992 Ms.Tatiana Samolis, the spokesperson of the KGB’s successor organization, the Federal Intelligence service [FIS], in a press briefing in Moscow [which was reported in the Hindu 4.7.92] confirmed that indeed such a connection between the KGB and Mainos had existed “in view of the ideological confrontation that prevailed in the world at that time” In the 1989 elections for example the Mainos spent Rs.10 crores on select candidates of the Congress Party in the General Elections, obviously to create cheerleaders for Ms.Sonia Gandhi for a future contingency, Mr.Arjun Singh was one such recipient from the Mainos. Ms.Sonia Gandhi, her mother and sister are thus guilty of offences under IPC Sections 120B read with 171-C and 171-H, as well as FERA and FCRA.

F.                  The Mainos have systematically plundered and exported the ancient treasures of India, especially temple sculptures of Tamil Nadu, Andhra, Orissa and Madhya Pradesh, Mughal paintings and precious gems in Indian Museums, all protected and banned from export under the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. The CBI had in 1993 registered cases on such illegal exports from a Chennai Suburb to an identified person in Italy (see enclosed document). Alitalia and Air India flights were used to send unchecked crates after after crates misusing the SPG cover first to Italy for display in shops owned by her family e.g.Etnica in Rivolta or Ganpati in Orbassano [see enclosed photo and calling card], and after creating an ownership on paper, getting the contraband auctioned by Sotheebys and Christies, the London auctioneers. Fred Watson’s            Sothebys-An Inside Story [Random House, 1998] gives some clues on such a racket. There is in the records of the Ministry of Human Resources enough materials in Notes on file of Directors Generals of Archeological Survey of India to suggest precious ancient paintings of the Mughal period were removed and declared “stolen” or missing, but ended up in a house in Golf Links, New Delhi which Ms.Sonia Gandhi had frequented. Even the Festival of India was used as a ploy to smuggle out such treasures.  In arranging these delicate operations the Mainos took the help Mr.Arjun Singh [when he was Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister and later Union Human Resources Development Minister], art expert Martand Singh, a Pakistani couple Muneer and Farida Attaullah, London based Pakistani fixer Salman Thassir a prince of Kuwait, and even the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) which has been convicted by courts in India for the assassination of Mr.Rajiv Gandhi Thus, Ms.Sonia Gandhi and her Italian relatives are culpable for various offences under the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act as well as under Sections 295, 378 and 410 of the IPC.

G.                  When Rajiv Gandhi married Sonia Gandhi on February 25, 1968, she was poor. Her Father Stefano Maino had lost everything after his party leader, Benito Mussolini, the II Duce of Fascist Italy, was overthrown and killed. After World War II, Stefano became a brick layer, and Sonia’s mother, Paola Predebon, a share cropper. Like many poor Italian families, Sonia was dispatched to learn English in a teaching shop in Cambridge town and thus land a job as an hostess or in similar employment, a modest goal indeed. Her marriage to Rajiv Gandhi on 25.2.68 however changed all that. And because of the aforesaid illegal activities, the Maino family became in just 25 years the richest family of Italy with net worth of US $ 2.0 billion. The respected Swiss magazine, Schweizer Illusttrierte, in its November 1991 issue, reported that the Mainos had in 1991 about $2.7 billion. But over the 1990s decade, the Mainos appear to have lost some of the money due to reckless investments, collapse of the Barings Bank, and ostentatious spending. They are still worth about US $2.0 billion today.

H.                 Ms.Sonia Gandhi has also fully utilized the martyrdom of her husband Rajiv Gandhi to advance her political career as well as to take control of the Nehru family’s monetary inheritance. The Rajiv Gandhi Foundation was set up under her chairmanship and Rs.200 crores collected during Narasimha Rao’s          tenure as PM, for use in education and public affairs. Yet an analysis of the accounts of the Foundation show that only 3% of the income is being used for the stated objectives while 97% is deployed  for other goals including for private travel of Ms.Gandhi and her chosen ones. This is a violation of the Trust Act and thus Ms.Gandhi and other trustees can be          proceeded under Section 92 of the CPC. There is already a PIL in the Delhi High Court in this matter.

3.                  Circumstantial evidence is also fast accumulating that makes it now imperative for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe whether the mother (Ms.Paola Maino) and sister (Ms.Anushka Vinci) of Ms.Sonia Gandhi, have had a long term continuing association since 1984 with the terrorist organization, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), The Supreme Court had delivered on May 12, 1999 a stinging judgement that held the LTTE responsible for the assassination of India’s former Prime Minister Mr.Rajiv Gandhi. The Government had set up a Multi Disciplinary Monitoring Agency (MDMA) in August 1998, led by the CBI, to probe leads such as that have now surfaced regarding the Maino-LTTE links.

4.                  The Circumstantial evidence of these links include Sonia Gandhi’s plea for commuting the death penalty for her husband’s killers; in providing one acre of land near the Indira Gandhi International Airport, Delhi, for housing the Periyar Centre for the pro-LTTE and secessionist Dravida Kazhagam (DK) which had been indicted in Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination by the Jain Commission (Part III, Vol.IV, Chapter VII, Pages 161-73, of the Final Report) and whose seven key members have been sentenced along with nineteen others of the LTTE by the Supreme Court, for participating in the assassination conspiracy. There are several other examples of Ms.Sonia Gandhi going inexplicably soft                     on the LTTE, including remaining silent on the failure of the government to extradite the LTTE Supremo Prabhakaran.

5.                  The CBI-led Multi Disciplinary Monitoring Agency (MDMA) set up after the Jain Commission Final Report, should therefore send interrogatories to the Maino family in Italy about all this, and investigate the extent of their connections with LTTE.

6.            Ms.Sonia Gandhi’s family in Italy constitutes a major national security risk for India, but paradoxically they enjoy the cover of the Indian state for their nefarious activities. The RAW, India’s foreign intelligence agency has reports of this national security risk. While in service (during Rajiv Gandhi’s tenure as PM), the Additional Director of RAW, B.Raman had in a report stated:

                                                                                                                

“Ms.Sonia Gandhi’s umbilical cord is strongly tied to Italy. Her close relatives are Italian citizens living in Italy. India has important national security interest in Italy because of its arms, nuclear and technology supply relationships with Pakistan and China.”

Raman concluded that no source in Italy or in EU would cooperate with Indian Intelligence on this issue since they would fear that one day perhaps these sources may fall into Italian hands. After retirement from RAW, Raman even published these views in Statesman (May 16, 1999) in an article under his own name.

Italy, incidentally, is flouting US sanctions and providing avionics to the Sino-Pakistan Joint project to manufacture the F-1 Chinese design plane update, which is to be a successor to the US F-16 super fighter jets. Indian Intelligence is busy trying to build sources in Italy to track details of this collaboration.

7.       For all these information I have written to Ms.Vasundara Raje, Minister in charge of Personnel (i.e.,CBI) to initiate a CBI inquiry. On all the above, if on no action is initiated, I will have no other option but to move the courts myself to set the law into motion.                                 

     

                                                                                         We, The People Of India

                                                                               Appeal to the Nationalists Straight forward Citizen

                                                                                 Strive to Protect The Dignity of our Nation